Voices in and beyond speech
Vocational students' experiences of special needs support in Sweden
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7577/sjvd.5890Keywords:
vocational education and training (VET),, special educational needs (SEN), special needs education (SNE),, vocational didactics., interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA)Abstract
This paper aims to explore and develop an understanding of special needs support from the student’s perspective in upper secondary vocational education and training (VET). Research has shown that students in vocational programs are in high need of accommodation and require increased special needs education (SNE), especially in activities and subjects with an academic focus. Recent research reviews focusing on special education show that more inclusive assessment practices are needed (Öhman, 2022) as well as more research in the area of special needs education in vocational education. This qualitative study was inspired by a phenomenological approach interested in understanding social phenomena from the participants’ perspectives and lived experiences. Following this approach, the analysis uses Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA) as a tool to map and interpret participants’ expressions in their daily context. The empirical material is drawn from seven semi-structured interviews with students in special needs support, undertaken in two upper secondary vocational schools in two separate municipalities and regions in Sweden. To analyse and widen the understanding of the informants’ descriptions of their possibilities and hindrances to participate in their educational activities, the following theoretical perspectives are used: Klafki’s critical constructive Didaktik, Persson’s categorical and relational perspectives on special education, and Lawys theorized concept of voice. The analysis shows that the students’ experiences of special needs support are ambivalent. The results display not only a division between the teaching of vocational and academic subjects and support in upper secondary VET, but the analysis leads to a need for further exploration of SEN in vocational education and the role of didactics that include students’ voices.
Downloads
References
Asghari, H. (2024). Yrkesdidaktik utifrån industrilärares berättelser: En studie om yrkesundervisning och yrkeslärande i svenska yrkesgymnasieskolor. Skandinavisk tidsskrift for yrker og profesjoner i utvikling, 9(1), 91–109. https://doi.org/10.7577/sjvd.5710
Berglund, I., & Henning Loeb, I. (2013). Renaissance or a backward step? Disparities and tensions in two new Swedish pathways in VET. International Journal of Training Research, 11(2), 135–149. https://doi.org/10.5172/ijtr.2013.11.2.135
Björk-Åman, C., Holmgren, R., Pettersson, G., & Ström, K. (2021). Nordic research on special needs education in upper secondary vocational education and training: A review. Nordic Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 11(1), 97–123. https://doi.org/10.3384/njvet.2242-458X. 2111197
Björk-Åman, C., & Ström, K. (2022). Between structure and individual needs: a discourse-analytic study of support and guidance for students with special needs in Finnish vocational education and training. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 68(2), 260-272. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2022.2127875
Blanck, J.M., Menze, L., & Nusser, L. (2024). Subjective well-being in early adulthood – long-term consequences of inclusive vs segregated education for students with special educational needs in Germany? European Journal of Special Needs Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2024.2400770
Boardman, A.G., Santiago Schwarz, V., & Sollenberger, L. (2024). Integrating disability into equity-focused general education teacher preparation. Frontiers in Education, https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1372380
Frejd, P., & Muhrman, K. (2022). Is the mathematics classroom a suitable learning space for making workplace mathematics visible? – An analysis of a subject-integrated team-teaching approach applied in different learning spaces, Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 74(2), 333-351. https://doi.org/10.1080/13636820.2020.1760337
Gilberg, A. (2024). «Du blir litt sånn selvsikker, og tenker at ‹wow› noen vil faktisk sende bilen til oss!»: Ungdomsbedrift som virkemiddel for en opplevd relevant skolehverdag. Skandinavisk tidsskrift for yrker og profesjoner i utvikling, 9(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.7577/sjvd.4999
Hiim, H. (2020). The quality and standing of school-based Norwegian VET, Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 72(2), 228-249, https://doi.org/10.1080/13636820.2020.1734062
Hodkinson, A. (2024). Three little words: A qualitative exploration of special needs and its hidden deceit. International Review of Qualitative Research, 0(0), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1177/19408447241282102
Illeris, K. (2015). Lärande. Studentlitteratur.
Jungjohann, J., & Gebhardt, M. (2023). Dimensions of Classroom-Based Assessments in Inclusive Education: A Teachers’ Questionnaire for Instructional Decision-Making, Educational Assessments, Identification of Special Educational Needs, and Progress Monitoring. International Journal of Special Education, 38(1), 131–144. https://doi.org/10.52291/ijse.2023.38.12
Keles, S., ten Braak, D., & Munthe, E. (2022). Inclusion of students with special education needs in Nordic countries: a systematic scoping review. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 68(3), 431–446. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2022.2148277
Klafki, W. (1995). Didactic analysis is the core of the preparation of instruction. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 27(1), 13-30.
Klafki, W. (1998). Characteristics of critical-constructive Didaktik. In B. B. Gundem & S. Hopmann (Eds.), Didaktik and/or curriculum: An international dialogue (pp. 307-330). Peter Lang.
Klafki, W. (2014). Dannelsesteori og Didaktik: Nye studier [Theory of Bildung and Didaktik: New studies] (3rd ed.). Klim.
Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2014). Den kvalitativa forskningsintervjun. Studentlitteratur.
Lawy, J.R. (2017). Theorizing voice: Performativity, politics and listening. Anthropological Theory, 17(2), 192-215. https://doi.org/10.1177/1463499617713138
Laczik, A., Dabbous, D., Emms, K., Patel, J., Hordern, J., Polding, L., Orr, K., Relly, S. J., Wormald,J, & Quyoum, A. (in press). Degree Apprenticeships in England: perceptions and experiences of key stakeholders. Edge Foundation.
Muhrman, K. (2022). How can students in vocational education be motivated to learn mathematics? Nordic Journal of Comparative and International Education, 12(3), 47-70. https://doi.org/10.3384/njvet.2242-458X.2212347
Mårtensson, S., Lidström, H., & Ekbladh, E. (2023). Students with difficulties managing vocational education in high school: Identifying intervention areas related to self-reported student-environment fit and mental health. Journal of Occupational Therapy, Schools, & Early Intervention, 17(3), 829–841. https://doi.org/10.1080/19411243.2023.2215763
Paul. E. (2022). Stödpraktiker i relation till arbetsplatsförlagt lärande i svensk gymnasial lärlingsutbildning [Supporting practices in relation to work-based learning in Swedish upper secondary apprenticeship programmes]. Nordic Journal of Comparative and International Education, 6(3-4). https://doi.org/10.7577/njcie.4842
Persson, B. (2019). Elevers olikheter och specialpedagogisk kunskap [Pupils' differences and special education knowledge ]. Liber.
Ryökkynen, S. (2023). "They did not give up on me.": Vocational students’ perceptions of the special support in their studying (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-951-51-8741-3
SFS 2010: 800. Skollagen [The Swedish Education Act]. Retreived from http://www.riksdagen.se/sv/Dokument-Lagar/Lagar/Svenskforfattningssamling/Skollag-2010800_sfs-2010-800/?bet=2010:800
Smith, J. A., Flowers, P., & Larkin, M. (2009). Interpretative phenomenological analysis. Sage.
Stanczak, A., Aelenei, C., Pironom, J., Toczek-Capelle, M-C., Rohmer, O., Jury., M. (2023). Can students with special educational needs overcome the “success” expectations? Social Psychology of Education, 27, 687-708. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-023-09806-x
Swedish National Agency for Education (2024). Ny statistik om elever som avslutat årskurs 9 och gått direkt till gymnasieskolan [New statistics on pupils who finished grade 9 and went directly to upper secondary school]. Retrieved from https://www.skolverket.se/skolutveckling/statistik/fler-statistiknyheter/statistik/2024-03-14-ny-statistik-om-elever-som-gatt-direkt-till-gymnasieskolan-efter-arskurs-9
Uthus, M., & Aas, H. K. (2024). Inclusion explored through student voices within the framework of formal teacher-student conversations. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2024.2349955
Yardley, L. (2000). Dilemmas in qualitative health research. Psychology & Health, 15(2), 215–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870440008400302
Yngve, M., Lidström, H., Ekbladh, E., & Hemmingsson, H. (2019). Which students need accommodations the most, and to what extent are their needs met by regular upper secondary school? A cross-sectional study among students with special educational needs. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 34(3), 327-341. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2018.1501966
Öhman, A. (2018). Twist and shape: Feedback practices within creative subject content of hairdressing education. Vocations and Learning, 11, 425-448. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12186-017-9196-5
Öhman, A. (2022). Bedömning för alla? En SMART forskningsöversikt över specialpedagogiska behov och kunskapsbedömning [Assessment for all? A SMART research review on special educational needs and knowledge assessment]. Rapporter i Pedagogik 26. Örebro universitet. Retrieved from https://www.oru.se/contentassets/a9223a988167438cb1dd78e959ba2aca/bedomning-for-alla-en-smart-forskningsoversikt-over-specialpedagogiska-behov-och-kunskapsbedomning.pdf
Öhman, A. (2023). Gymnasieelevers erfarenheter av särskilt stöd: Berättelser om utanförskap och tillhörighet [High school students' experiences of special support: Stories of exclusion and belonging]. Pedagogisk forskning i Sverige, 28(3), 6-29. https://doi.org/10.15626/pfs28.03.01
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Anna Öhman
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in SJVD accept the following terms:
- The author(s) retain copyright and gives the journal the right to the first publication of the work licensed simultaneously under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work when authorship and first release in the SJVD are recognised.
- The author(s) may enter separate, extra-contractual arrangements for non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (for example, send it to an institutional archive or publish it in a book) referring to the first release in SJVD.
- The author(s) are allowed and encouraged to post their work online (e.g. in institutional archives and on their website) before and during the filing process, as it may lead to useful exchanges of views, as well as faster and increased citation the published work.