Digitale ferdigheiter som ferdigrett eller råvare?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7577/formakademisk.3696Emneord (Nøkkelord):
Digitale ferdigheiter, handverk, kroppsleg erkjenning, maker movement, demokratiSammendrag
I det digitaliserte samfunnet i dag skjer ei betydeleg endring i læringa sine materielle føresetnader, frå konkrete og analoge læringsmiljø til digitale og virtuelle. Parallelt med den massive digitale satsinga i nordiske utdanningssystem har det vekse fram ei global rørsle kalla the maker movement. Denne artikkelen undersøker korleis rørsla kan bidra til ei breiare og fleirfasettert tilnærming til digital kompetanse i Kunst og handverk (KogH), enn den skjermtunge praksisen som til no har dominert. Gjennom studie av læreplanar, læringsteoriar, eigen praksis i feltet, praktiske døme og den stadig veksande ‘makerrørsla’, vert det undersøkt om utdanningssystemet i større grad burde støtte seg til den faglege og forskingsmessige kunnskapen om kropp og materialet si rolle i barn si læring når viktige avgjersler om skuleutvikling og digitalisering av KogH-faget skal takast.
Nøkkelord:
Digitale ferdigheiter, handverk, kroppsleg erkjenning, maker movement, demokrati.
Referanser
Blikstein, P. (2013). Digital Fabrication and ‘Making’ in Education: The Democratization of Invention. In J. Walter-Herrmann & C. Büching (Eds.), FabLabs: Of Machines, Makers and Inventors (pp. 1-21). Transcript Publishers. https://doi.org/10.14361/transcript.9783839423820.203
Carlsen, K. (2015). Forming i barnehagen i lys av Reggio Emilias atelierkultur [Doctoral Thesis, Åbo Akademi University]. Åbo Akademis förlag. https://www.doria.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/103745/carlsen_kari.pdf?sequence=2
Davies, S., Hakkarainen, K., Seitamaa-Hakkarainen, P., Korhonen, T., & Kokko, S. (2020). The development of pedagogical infrastructures in three cycles of maker-centered learning projects. Design and Technology Education: an International Journal, 2(25), 29-49, https://ojs.lboro.ac.uk/DATE/article/view/2782
Dixon, C., & Martin, L. (2017). Make to Relate: Analyzing Narratives of Community Practice. Cognition and instruction, 35(2), 103-124. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2017.1282484
EACEA European Commission. (2013). Education and Training in Europe 2020: Responses from the EU Member States. Retrieved 01.09.2020 from https://eacea.ec.europa.eu/national-policies/eurydice/content/education-and-training-europe-2020-responses-eu-member-states_en
Ellis, C., & Bochner, A. (2000). Autoethnography, Personal Narrative, Reflexivity: Researcher as Subject. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research (2nd Ed., p. 733-768), Sage Publications.
Fabfoundation. (2019). About the fab foundation. https://www.fabfoundation.org/#page-top
Fasso, W., & Knight, B. (2019). Identity development in school makerspaces: intentional design. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 30, 275–294. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-019-09501-z
Frangou, S.-M. (2020). Write to Recall. An Embodied Knowledge Construction Model of Affects in Writing. [Doctoral Thesis, University of Lapland]. Lauda. https://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-337-188-0
Fredriksen, B. C. (2011). When past and new experiences meet. Negotiating meaning with 3-D materials in early childhood education. FormAkademisk, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.7577/formakademisk.128
Gulliksen, M. S. (2017). Making matters? Unpacking the role of practical aesthetic making activities in the general education through the theoretical lens of embodied learning. Cogent Education, 4(1), 1415108. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2017.1415108
Gutwill, J. P., Hido, N., & Sindorf, L. (2015). Research to Practice: Observing Learning in Tinkering Activities. Curator: The Museum Journal, 58(2), 151-168. https://doi.org/10.1111/cura.12105
Han, B.-C. (2017). In the Swarm : Digital Prospects. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/11055.001.0001
Hatch, M. (2013). The Maker Movement Manifesto: Rules for Innovation in the New World of Crafters, Hackers, and Tinkerers. McGraw-Hill.
Hsu, Y.-C., Baldwin, S., & Ching, Y.-H. (2017). Learning through Making and Maker Education. TechTrends, 61(6), 589-594. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-017-0172-6
Iivari, N., Kinnula, M., Molin-Juustila, T., & Kuure, L. (2017). Multiple voices in the maker movement - a nexus analytic literature review on children, education and making. In Proceedings of the 25th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS), Guimarães, Portugal, June 5-10, 2017 (pp. 1919-1933). https://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2017_rp/123
Internetworldstats. (2019). Internet in Europe Stats Internet User Statistics & 2019 Population for the 53 European countries and regions. https://www.internetworldstats.com/stats4.htm
Johns, J., & Hall, S. M. (2020). ‘I have so little time […] I got shit I need to do’: Critical perspectives on making and sharing in Manchester’s FabLab. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 52(7), 1292-1312. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518x19897918
Kohtala, C. (2017). Making@ Making Critical: How Sustainability is Constituted in Fab Lab Ideology. The Design Journal, 20, 375 - 394. https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2016.1261504
Kunnskapsdepartementet. (2020a). Læreplan i kunst og håndverk (KHV01‑02) [Norwegian curiuculum in Art and handcraft]. https://www.udir.no/lk20/khv01-02
Kunnskapsdepartementet. (2020b). Overordnet del. Skaperglede, engasjement og utforskertrang [General part. Maker joy, commitment and desire to explore]. https://www.udir.no/lk20/overordnet-del/opplaringens-verdigrunnlag/1.4-skaperglede-engasjement-og-utforskertrang/
Lakkala, M., Ilomäki, L., & Kosonen, K. (2010). From Instructional Design to Setting Up Pedagogical Infrastructures: Designing Technology-Enhanced Knowledge Creation. In B. Ertl (Ed.). Technologies and Practices for Constructing Knowledge in Online Environments: Advancements in Learning (pp. 169-185). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-61520-937-8.ch008
Lakkala, M., Muukkonen, H., Paavola, S., & Hakkarainen, K. (2008). Designing Pedagogical Infrastructures in University Courses for Technology-Enhanced Collaborative Inquiry. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 3, 33-64. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1793206808000446
Letnes, M.-A., Sando, S. & Hardersen, B. (2016). Småbarn og digitale medier 2016 : en kvalitativ undersøkelse om norske 0-8-åringers bruk av digitale (online) medier [Small children and digital media – A qualitative survey on Norwegian 0–8-year-olds' use of digital (online) media]. Medietilsynet. https://medietilsynet.no/globalassets/dokumenter/rapporter/ensidig_smabarn-og-digitale-medier-2016.pdf
Lowenfeld, V., & Brittain, W. L. (1952). Creative and mental growth (Rev. ed.). Macmillan.
Mangen, A. (2016). What Hands May Tell Us about Reading and Writing. Educ Theory, 66(4), 457-477. https://doi.org/10.1111/edth.12183
Mangen, A., & Balsvik, L. (2016). Pen or keyboard in beginning writing instruction? Some perspectives from embodied cognition. Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 5, 99-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tine.2016.06.003
Mangen, A., & Kuiken, D. (2014). Mangen, A. & Kuiken, D. (2014) Lost in an iPad: Narrative engagement on paper and tablet. Scientific Study of Literature, 4. https://doi.org/10.1075/ssol.4.2.02man
Montessori, M. (1964). The advanced Montessori method. R. Bentley.
Montessori, M. (1965). Spontaneous activity in education. Schocken Books.
Nemorin, S. (2016). The frustrations of digital fabrication: an auto/ethnographic exploration of ‘3D Making’ in school. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-016-9366-z
Papert, S. (1993). Mindstorms : children, computers, and powerful ideas (2nd ed.). Basic Books.
Pirhonen, A., & Rousi, R. (2018). Educational Technology Goes Mobile: Why? A Case Study of Finland. International Journal of Mobile Human Computer Interaction, 10, 65-72. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJMHCI.2018040104
Rikt AS. (2020). Om oss. https://rikt.net/#tab-id-1
Rosa, H., & Wagner, J. (2019). Resonance : a sociology of our relationship to the world. Polity.
Sawyer, R. K. (2014). Conclusion: The Future of Learning: Grounding Educational Innovation in the Learning Sciences. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.) The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences (Second Ed., pp. 726-746): Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139519526.043
Seitamaa-Hakkarainen, P., Laamanen, T.-K., Viitala, J., & Mäkelä, M. (2013). Materiality and Emotions in Making Materiality and Emotions in Making. Techne Serien - Forskning I slöjdpedagogik Och slöjdvetenskap, 20(3), 5-19. https://journals.oslomet.no/index.php/techneA/article/view/702
Sennett, R. (2008). The Craftsman. Yale University Press.
Sheridan, K., Halverson, E. R., Litts, B., Brahms, L., Jacobs-Priebe, L., & Owens, T. (2014). Learning in the Making: A Comparative Case Study of Three Makerspaces. Harvard Educational Review, 84(4), 505-531. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.84.4.brr34733723j648u
Nedlastinger
Publisert
Hvordan referere
Utgave
Seksjon
Lisens
Opphavsrett 2020 Ingrid Holmboe Høibo, Morten Henrik Lerpold
Dette verket er lisensiert under Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
- Forfatteren(e) beholder sin opphavs- og kopieringsrett til eget manuskript, men gir tidsskriftet varig rett til 1) å fremføre manuskriptet for offentligheten i den opprinnelig publiserte digitale form, og 2) å registreres og siteres som første publisering av manuskriptet.
- Forfatteren må selv forvalte sine økonomiske kopieringsrettigheter overfor eventuell tredjepart.
- Tidsskriftet gir ingen økonomisk eller annen kompensasjon for innsendte bidrag, medmindre det er gjort særskilt avtale om dette med forfatteren(e).
- Tidsskriftet plikter å arkivere manuskriptet (inklusive metadata) i den opprinnelig publiserte digitale form, i minst ett dertil egnet åpent tilgjengelig langtidsarkiv for digitalt materiell, som for eksempel i de norske universitetenes institusjonsarkiv innen rammen av NORA-samarbeidet.
Verket vil bli publisert OpenAccess med en Creative Commons 4.0-lisens som tillater alle å lese, dele og tilpasse innholdet, også kommersielt, under lisensvilkårene:
Dette verket må tilskrives/ krediteres på riktig måte, en lenke må gis til CC-BY 4.0-lisensen, og endringer som er gjort må angis på en rimelig måte, men ikke på noen måte som antyder at lisensgiveren støtter deg eller din bruk.
Cited by
