Underlying the carver’s experience : Sensorimotor modulation in cerebellum when carving wood

Marte Sørebø Gulliksen

doi:10.7577/formakademisk.3581

Authors

Marte Sørebø Gulliksen University of Southeast Norway http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8074-1850

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7577/formakademisk.3581

Keywords:

woodcarving, cerebellum, experience, moving and sensing, neurobiology

Abstract

Woodcarvers often report their experiences as having an intense internal focus, and feeling of a close connection to the material. This article explore key processes in cells and organs that underlies these experiences, emphasizing the sensorymotor modulation in cerebellum. The article has two aims: To bring neurobiological knowledge into the making disciplines to better understand the making process; To mediate terminological differences between disciplines and open up new research-based hypotheses and theoretical foundations for future interdisciplinary studies. Findings include three topics for further exploration: 1) The overflow of information in cerebellum and the maker’s experience of intense internal focus. 2) Cerebellum’s function as generator of deliberate actions without involving the conscious self and the so-called preconscious element of the maker’s negotiation. 3) The priority of neural circuits between sensory input and muscle output in Cerebellum at the cost of neural circuits to cerebral cortex’ monitoring and self-reflection and the maker’s experience as being close to the material. These findings expand upon previous knowledge developed in studies of making processes from sociocultural and philosophical point of view, and are useful for researchers and teachers interested in understanding and advancing the making disciplines and arts and craft education.

References

Bammer, G. (2013). Disciplining interdisciplinarity. Integration and implementation sciences for researching complex real-world problems. Australian National University E-press.

Bresler, L. (2004). Knowing bodies, moving minds: Towards embodied teaching and learning. Kluwer.

Crawford, M. (2009). The case for working with your hands. Penguin.

Crollen, V., & Noël ,M.-P. (2015). Spatial and numerical processing in children with high and low visuospatial abilities. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,132, 84-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2014.12.006

Dahl, J. S., & Dahl, A. S. (2020). Woodspirit handcraft – Creating beauty for everyday life [Blog]. http://woodspirithandcraft.com/ 20.04.2020

Donoghue, G. M., & Horvath, J. C. (2016). Translating neuroscience, psychology and education: An abstracted conceptual framework for the learning sciences. Cogent Education, 2016(3), 1-10. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/2331186X.2016.1267422

Dunin-Woyseth, H., & Michl, J. (2001). Towards a disciplinary identity of the making professions: An introduction. The Millennium Reader. H. Dunin-Woyseth and J. Michl. Oslo: Oslo School of Architecture.

Elbert, T., Pantev, C., Wienbruch, C., Rockstrosh, D., & Taub, E. (1995). Increased cortical representation of the fingers of the left hand in string players. Science, 270, 305-307.

Fredriksen, B. (2011). Embodied experience with three-dimensional materials and the negotiation of meaning in early childhood education. (PhD), Oslo School of Architecture and Design, Oslo.

Friston K. (2002) Functional integration and inference in the brain. Progress in Neurobiology, 68, 113-143.

Cerebellum (2020). In Visible body human anatomy atlas, (version 2020.0): Wolters Kluwer. Argosy Publishing Inc. http://www.Visiblebody.com

Goguen, J. A., & Myin, E. (2000). Art and the brain part II. Imprint Academic.

Goodman, S. G., Seymour, T. L., & Anderson, B. R. (2016). Achieving the performance benefits of hands-on experience when using digital devices. A representational approach. Computers in Human Behavior , 58-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.01.006

Groh, J. M. (2014). Making space: How the brain knows where things are. Harvard University Press.

Groth, C. (2015). Emotions in risk-assessment and decision-making processes during craft practice. Journal of Research Practice, 11(2), article M5, 1-21. http://jrp.icaap.org/index.php/jrp/article/view/502

Groth, C. (2016). The role of sensory experiences and emotion in craft practice. In P. Lloyd and E. Bohemia. Proceedings of DRS 2016 International Conference: Future-Focused Thinking. Proceedings of DRS.. Brighton, DRS DRS2016, Brighton.

Groth, C., Mäkelä, M., & Seitamaa-Hakkarainen, P. (2013). Making sense - What can we learn from experts of tactile knowledge. FORMakademisk, 6(2), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.7577/formakademisk.656

Gulliksen, M. (1997). Det skapende møtet - En teoretisk og en praktisk estetisk studie av personens møte med materialet i den skapende prosessen. Avdeling for estetiske fag og formkultur. Notodden, Høgskolen i Telemark.

Gulliksen, M. (2001). The creative meeting - A discussion over the aesthetic elements in the creative process. Visioner om Slöjd och slöjdpedagogik. C. Nygren-Landgärds and J. Peltonen. Vasa, NordFo/Åbo Universitet. B:10/2001.

Gulliksen, M. S. (2016a). Embodied making, creative cognition and memory: Drawing on neurobiological knowledge on creative cognition and the role of hippocampus in memory storing and recollection to explore the experience of carving in green wood. FORMakademisk, 9(1), 1-19. http://dx.doi.org/10.7577/formakademisk.1487

Gulliksen, M. S. (2016b). Why making matters—developing an interdisciplinary research project on how embodied making may contribute to learning. In P. Lloyd and E. Bohemia. Proceedings of DRS 2016 International Conference: Future-Focused Thinking. Proceedings of DRS. (pp. 2925-2940). Brighton, DRS. 7..

Gulliksen, M. S. (2017). Making matters? Unpacking the role of practical aesthetic making activities in the general education through the theoretical lens of embodied learning. Cogent Education, 4(1), 1-14 https://www.cogentoa.com/article/10.1080/2331186X.2017.1415108.

Gulliksen, M. S. (forthcoming). Losing and regaining the sense of space (manuscript, submitted)

Gulliksen, M. S., Groth, C., Mäkelä, M., & Seitamaa-Hakkarainen, P. (2016). Introduction to additional theme session 4 - Embodied making and learning. In P. Lloyd and E. Bohemia. Proceedings of DRS 2016 International Conference: Future-Focused Thinking. Proceedings of DRS. Brighton, DRS Brighton, Design Research Society. 20–27 June 2016).

Huotilainen, M., Rankanen, M., Groth, C., Seitamaa-Hakkarainen, P., & Mäkelä, M. (2018). Why our brains love arts and crafts: Implications of creative practices on psychophysical well-being. FORMakademisk, 11(2), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.7577/formakademisk.1908

Ingold, T. (2013). Making: Anthropology, archaeology, art and architecture. Routledge.

Kirchhoff, M. (2018). Predictive brains and embodied, enactive cognition: An introduction to the special issue. Synthese, 195(6), 2355–2366.

Maguire, E. A., Gadian, D. G., Johnsrude, I. S., Good, C. D., Ashburner, J., Frackowiak, R. S. J. . . . D., F. C. (2000). Navigation-related structural change in the hippocampi of taxi drivers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 97, 4398–4403.

Mason, P. (2011). Medical neurobiology. Oxford University Press.

Mason, P. (2015). Understanding the brain: The neurobiology of everyday life - lectures 1–10. Coursera The University of Chicago. https://www.coursera.org/learn/neurobiology

Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). Phenomenology of perception (C. Smith, Trans.). Routledge.

Osborne, E. J. (Producer). (2014, 01.06.2015). How to make a wooden spoon. TedXBrighton. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rl4upXR6k5Y

Polanyi M. (1966) The Tacit Dimension. Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Purves, D., Augustine, G. J., Fitzpatrick, D., Hall, W. C., LaMantia, A. S., & White, L. E. (Eds.). (2012). Neuroscience, fifth edition. Sinauer Associates.

Robbins, P., & Aydede, M. (2009). A short primer on situated cognition. In P. Robbins & M. Aydede (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of situated cognition (pp. 3–11) Cambridge University Press.

Schilhab, T., Kuzmicova, A., & Balling, G. (2018). Decreasing materiality from print to screen reading. First Monday, 23(10). https://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/9435

Seitamaa-Hakkarainen, P. (2015). What neuroscience can tell us about skill learning in craft - The promise of cognitive neuroscience in design studies. Paper presented at the LearnXDesign2016 - CUMULUS and DRS Conference, Chicago.

Seitamaa-Hakkarainen, P., Huotilainen, M., Mäkelä, M., Groth, C., & Hakkarainen, K. (2014). The promise of cognitive neuroscience in design studies. Paper presented at the DRS2014, Umeå, Sweden.

Twardosz, S. (2012). Effects on experience on the brain: The role of neuroscience in early development and education. Early Education and Development, 23(1), 96–119. http://doi:10.1080/10409289.2011.613735

Varela, F. J., Vermersch, P., & Depraz, N. (2003). On becoming aware: A pragmatics of experiencing. John Benjamins Publishing.

Wall, M. (2014). How neuroscience is being used to spread quackery in business and education. The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/how-neuroscience-is-being-used-to-spread-quackery-in-business-and-education-30342

Western. (2014). Minds on minds - Education-Neuroscience Symposium, Western University, London Ontario.

Zaidel, D. W. (2005). Neuropsychology of art: Neurological, cognitive and evolutionary perspectives. Psychology Press.