Professional practice in Art and Crafts
Teachers' readiness to act in the workplace
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7577/formakademisk.5220Keywords:
The school subject Art and Crafts, action-based knowledge, embodied knowledge, vocational knowledge, professional knowledgeAbstract
The study is based on the personal experiences of Art and Crafts teachers’, and discusses what the teachers describe doing during their workday. The aim is to contribute to practice-oriented research in Art and Crafts by examining professional practice from the teacher's perspective. The analysis is based on interviews with nine teachers who give us a glimpse into their workday. The theoretical basis of the study builds on a phenomenological understanding of professional knowledge as action-based knowledge. More precisely, the teachers’ readiness to act is examined, understood as the knowledge and skills teachers need for their regular workday. We ask – what is the Art and Crafts teacher's readiness to act in their day-to-day professional life? The findings highlight the complexity of teachers’ professional practice. The analysis shows that readiness to act is composed of three dimensions: logistics and organisation; the practical, embodied knowledge of the teacher; and the teaching itself.
References
Andersson, J. & Johansson, M. (2017). Learning situations in Sloyd ‒ to become more handy, dexterous and skilful. Techne series, 24(2), 93-109. https://journals.oslomet.no/index.php/techneA/article/view/1875
Berg, L.-K. & Standal, Ø. F. (2024). Sammenhengen mellom øving og dybdelæring i kunst og håndverkundervisning Techne series - Forskning i slöjdpedagogik och slöjdvetenskap, 31(2), 22-33. https://doi.org/10.7577/TechneA.5558
Borg, K. (2021). Tendenser inom slöjdens forskningsområde. Techne series, 28(4), 231-254. https://doi.org/10.7577/TechneA.4738
Borgen, J. S. & Hjardemaal, F. R. (2017). From general transfer to deep learning as argument for practical aesthetic school subjects? Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 3(3), 218-229. https://doi.org/10.1080/20020317.2017.1352439
Børresen, A. K. & Molander, B. (2006). Håndverk og kunnskap (Bd. 5:2006). Tapir akademisk forlag.
Fauske, L. B. (2014). Å etablere et akademisk formingsfaglig miljø. Tilbakeblikk på den tidlige fasen for hovedfag i forming. FormAkademisk, 7(5), Art. 6, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.7577/formakademisk.930
Fauske, L. B. (2016). Reforhandling av kunnskapsgrunnlag. Forskning og fagutvikling med utspring i designdidaktikk. Techne series, 23(2), 50–68. https://journals.oslomet.no/index.php/techneA/article/view/1560
Fauske, L. B. (2020). Profesjonskunnskap: fag, forskning og praksiserfaring: perspektiv på lærerutdanning i design, kunst og håndverk. FormAkademisk, 13(5), Art. 2, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.7577/formakademisk.2680
Fuglseth, K. S. (2021). Vanar og praktisk kunnskap. I K. S. Fuglseth & C. T. Halås (Red.), Innføring i praktisk kunnskap (s. 117 - 130). Universitetsforlaget.
Fuglseth, K. S. & Halås, C. T. (2021). Fagområdet praktisk kunnskap. I K. S. Fuglseth & C. T. Halås (Red.), Innføring i praktisk kunnskap (s. 22 - 41). Universitetsforlaget.
Gill, M. (2020). Phenomenology as qualitative methodology. I M. J. N. Mik-Meyer (Red.), Qualitative Analysis: Eight Approaches for the Social Sciences (pp. 73-94). SAGE Publications.
Grimen, H. (2008). Profsjon og kunnskap. I A. Molander og L. I. Terum (Red.) Profesjonsstudier (s. 71-86). Universitetsforlaget.
Gulliksen, M. S. (2013). Gode Valg – om læreres utvelgelseskompetanse i Kunst og håndverk. FormAkademisk, 5(2), Art. 6, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.7577/formakademisk.501
Gårdvik, M. (2013). Textile Students’ Basic Knowledge and Skills - Interpretation, Understanding and Assessment of a Practical-Aesthetic Discipline in Norwegian teacher education. A case study. Techne series, 20(2), 48-59. https://journals.oslomet.no/index.php/techneA/article/view/667
Hasselskog, P. (2010). Slöjdlärares förhållningssätt i undervisningen [Doktoravhandling, Göteborgs universitet]. GUPEA. http://hdl.handle.net/2077/21997
Hoel, L. (2015). Politibetjentens handlingsberedskap : en praktisk kunnskap for å være skodd for små og store hendelser. I J. McGuirk & J. S. Methi (Red.), Praktisk kunnskap som profesjonsforskning : antologi over yrkeserfaringen som utgangspunkt for forståelse av kunnskapsutvikling i praksis (s. 199-218). Fagbokforlaget.
Janik, A. (1996). Kunskapsbegreppet i praktisk filosofi. Brutus Östlings bokförlag Symposion.
Jeansson, Å. (2017). Vad, hur och varför i slöjdämnet: textillärares uppfattningar om innehåll och undervisning i relation till kursplanen [Doktoravhandling, Umeå Universitet]. Umeå University Publications. https://umu.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2%3A1070235&dswid=-6944
Johansson, M. (2002). Slöjdpraktik i skolan : hand, tanke, kommunikation och andra medierande redskap [Doktoravhandling, Göteborgs universitet]. GUPEA. http://hdl.handle.net/2077/15749
Johansson, M. (2018). Doktorsavhandlingar inom det nordiska slöjdfältet. Techne series, 25(3), 109–123. https://journals.oslomet.no/index.php/techneA/article/view/3031
Kvale, S. & Brinkmann, S. (2021). Det kvalitative forskningintervju. Gyldendal Norsk Forlag.
Lindseth, A. (2009). Dannelsens plass i profesjonsutdanningene. I I. Bostad, T. A. Arnøy, O. E. Dørum, B. Hagtvet, B. Rokne, A. Lindseth, L. Løvlie & R. Strand, (Red.), Kunnskap og dannelse foran et nytt århundre: Innstilling fra Dannelsesutvalget for høyere utdanning (s. 21-27). [Universitetet i Bergen]. https://w2.uib.no/filearchive/innstilling-dannelsesutvalget.pdf
Lindseth, A. (2015). Svarevne og kritisk refleksjon : hvordan utvikle praktisk kunnskap? I J. McGuirk & J. S. Methi (Red.), Praktisk kunnskap som profesjonsforskning : antologi over yrkeserfaringen som utgangspunkt for forståelse av kunnskapsutvikling i praksis (s. 43-60). Fagbokforlaget.
Lindseth, A. (2021). Diskrepanserfaring og svarevne. I K. S. Fuglseth & C. T. Halås (Red.), Innføring i praktisk kunnskap. Anerkjennende, kritisk og konstruktiv praksisforskning (s. 41-49). Universitetsforlaget.
McGuirk, J. (2015). Fenomenologiske overveielser om praktisk kunnskap. I J. S. Methi & J. McGuirk (Red.), Praktisk kunnskap som profesjonsforskning (s. 61 - 80). Fagbokforlaget.
McGuirk, J. (2021). Taus kunnskap. I K. S. Fuglseth & C. T. Halås (Red.), Innføring i praktisk kunnskap. Anerkjennende, kritisk og konstruktiv praksisforskning (s. 61 - 73). Universitetsforlaget.
Molander, B. (1996). Kunskap i handling. Daidalos.
Molander, B. (1997). Arbetets kunskapsteori. Dialoger.
Molander, B. (2015). The Practice of Knowing and Knowing in Practices. Peter Lang. https://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-653-06131-4
Polanyi, M. (2000). Den tause dimensjonen : en innføring i taus kunnskap (E. Ra Overs.). Spartacus. (Opprinnelig utgitt 1966)
Polanyi, M. (2009). The tacit dimension. University of Chicago Press. (Opprinnelig utgitt 1966)
Svenaeus, F. (2009). Vad är praktisk kunskap? En inledning till ämnet och boken. I J. Bornemark & F. Svenaeus (Red.), Vad är praktisk kunskap? (s. 11-34). Södertörns högskola.
Syrjäläinen, E. (2002). Käsityön opettajan pedagogisen tiedon lähteeltä: Persoonalliset toimintatavat ja periaatteet käsityön opetuksen kontekstissa [On the source of a craft teacher’s pedagogical knowledge: Personal procedures and principles in craft teaching context] [Doktoravhandling, Helsingfors universitet]. Helda. University of Helsinki Open Repository. https://helda.helsinki.fi/items/70e4641e-1480-44a9-964f-4bd1331d250d
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Lise-Kari Berg, Øyvind Førland Standal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
- The author(s) must manage their economic reproduction rights to any third party.
- The journal makes no financial or other compensation for submissions, unless a separate agreement regarding this matter has been made with the author(s).
- The journal is obliged to archive the manuscript (including metadata) in its originally published digital form for at least a suitable amount of time in which the manuscript can be accessed via a long-term archive for digital material, such as in the Norwegian universities’ institutional archives within the framework of the NORA partnership.
Readers of the journal can print out the published manuscripts under the same conditions as apply to the reproduction of physical copies.