Education for sustainable clothing consumerism?
A critical examination of educational material for design and craft education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7577/formakademisk.5234Keywords:
Design literacy, educational material, craft, social marketing, sustinable consumerismAbstract
This paper sheds light on how aesthetic judgments govern actions in education for design literacy and sustainability behaviours. Educational material is examined by asking: (1) What meanings regarding becoming a sustainable consumer are made available to students in the educational material? (2) How are these narratives communicated to change students’ behaviours? The material in question consists of 17 design projects intended to be used in the Swedish school subject, Educational Sloyd. Using a practical epistemological analysis, two ways of becoming a sustainable consumer are identified: to have fun and to feel clever. The paper also shows how social marketing is used as a strategy in communicating how to change student behaviours. In the discussion, we turn to design literacy research to discuss the results from an educational perspective.
References
Andersson, J. & Maivorsdotter, N. (2017) The ‘body pedagogics’ of an elite footballer’s career path—analysing Zlatan Ibrahimovic’s biography. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 22(5), 502–517. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2016.1268591
Body, J. & Terrey, N. (2019). Design for a Better Future. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315163918
Brooks, A., Fletcher, K., Francis, R. A., Dulcie Rigby, E. & Roberts, T. (2017). Fashion, Sustainability, and the Anthropocene. Utopian Studies, 28(3), 428–504. https://doi.org/10.5325/utopianstudies.28.3.0482
Brülde, B., Dawson, A., Munthe, C., Selgelid, M. J., Persson, K., & Tengland, P.A. (2011). Folkhälsoarbetets etik [The ethics of public health work]. Studentlitteratur.
Buchanan, D.R., Reddy, S. & Hossain, Z. (1994). Social marketing: a critical appraisal. Health Promotion International, 9(1), 49–59. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/9.1.49
Clean Clothes (2018). Fashion’s Problems. Waste and pollution. https://cleanclothes.org/fashions-problems/waste-and-pollution
Christensen, K. S., Hjorth, M., Iversen, O. S., & Smith., R. C. (2019). Understanding design literacy in middle school education: Assessing students’ stances towards inquiry. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 29, 633–654. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-018-9459-y
Cross, N. (1982). Designerly Ways of Knowing. Design Studies, 3(4), 221–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-694X(82)90040-0
Cross, R., Davis, S., & O´Neil, I. (2017). Health communication: Theoretical and critical perspectives. Polity Press.
Dewey, J. (1934/2005). Art as experience. Perigee Books.
Donahue, T.J. & Ochoa Espejo, P. (2016). The analytical–Continental divide: Styles of dealing with problems. European Journal of Political Theory, 15(2), 138–154. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474885115585324
European Environmental Agency (2020). The impact of textile production and waste on the environment. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/headlines/society/20201208STO93327/the-impact-of-textile-production-and-waste-on-the-environment-infographics
Fletcher, K. (2016). Craft of use: Post-growth fashion. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315647371
Fry, T. (2009). Design futuring: sustainability, ethics, and new practice. Bloomsbury. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350036079
Fry, T. & Nocek, A. (red.) (2021). Design in crisis: new worlds, philosophies and practices. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003021469
Garrison, J. (2022). Transactional perspectivalism: The emergence of language, minds, selves and temporal sequence. In J. Garrison, J. Öhman, & L. Östman (Eds.), Deweyan transactionalism in education: Beyond self-action and inter-action (pp. 39–50). Bloomsbury Publishing. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350233348.ch-3
Gee, J. (2015). Social Linguistics and Literacies: Ideology in Discourses. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315722511
Green, J., Tones, K., Cross, R., & Woodall, J. (2019). Health promotion: Planning and strategies (4. ed.). Sage.
Hofverberg, H. & Maivorsdotter, N. (2018) Recycling, crafting and learning – an empirical analysis of how students learn with garments and textile refuse in a school remake project. Environmental Education Research 24(6), 775-790. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2017.1338672
Illum, B. (2006). Learning in practice – Practical wisdom: The dialogue of the process. Journal of Research in Teacher Education,16(2–3), 106–127.
Illum, B., & Johansson, M. (2009). Vad är tillräckligt mjukt? Kulturell socialisering och lärande i skolans slöjdpraktik [What is soft enough? Cultural socialisation and learning in educational sloyd]. FormAkademisk , 2(1), 69–82. https://doi.org/10.7577/formakademisk.62
Jakobson, B., & Wickman, P. -O. (2008). The roles of aesthetic experience in elementary school science. Research in Science Education, 38, 45–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-007-9039-8
Jensen, B &. Schnack, K. (1997). The Action Competence Approach in Environmental Education. Environmental Education Research 3(2), 163–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350462970030205
Jickling, B. (1992). Why I don’t want my children educated for sustainable education. Journal of Environmental Education 23(4), 5 – 8. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.1992.9942801
Kotler, P., Roberto, N., & Lee, N. (2002). Social marketing: Improving the quality of life. (2. ed). Sage.
Kronlid, D. (2021). Etisk teori – skolan som arena för moraliska utmaningar. In M. Serder, & A. Jobér (Eds.), Vetenskapliga teorier för lärare [Scientific theories for teachers] (pp. 419-437). Natur & Kultur.
Lehtonen, M.J., Yeow, P. and Chew, J.Y. (2022). Developing agency by framing wicked problems through design. Futures, 139(May), 102952. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2022.102952
Lindström, K., Jönsson, L. & Hillgren, P. (2021). Sketching hope and grief in transition. Situating anticipation in lived futures. Artifact: Journal of Design Practice, 8(1-2), 17.1-17.22. https://doi.org/10.1386/art_00017_1
Lutnæs, E. (2021). Framing the concept design literacy for a general public. FormAkademisk, 14(4), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.7577/formakademisk.4639
Marchand, T. H. J. (Ed.). (2017). Craftwork as Problem Solving: Ethnographic Studies of Design and Making. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315562803
Maus, I. G. (2019). Developing design literacy for sustainability. Lower secondary students’ life cycle thinking on their craft-based design products. FormAkademisk, 12(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.7577/formakademisk.1725
Nielsen, L. M., & Brænne, K. (2013). Design literacy for longer-lasting products. Studies in Material Thinking, 9, 1–9. https://materialthinking.aut.ac.nz/papers/125.html
Öhman, J. (2008). Environmental ethics and democracy responsibility- A pluralistic approach. In J. Öhman (Ed.), Values and Democracy in Education for Sustainable Development – Contributions from Swedish Research (pp.17–32). Liber.
Ojala, M., Cunsolo, A., Ogunbode, C. A. & Middleton, C. (2021). Anxiety, Worry, and Grief in a Time of Environmental and Climate Crisis: A Narrative Review. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 46, 35–58. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-012220-022716
Parker, R. M., Baker, D. W., Williams, M. V., & Nurss, J. R. (1995). The test of functional health literacy in adults. Journal of general internal medicine, 10(10), 537–541. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02640361
Rittel, H. W., & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4, 155–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01405730
Romanello, M., McGushin, A. & Di Napoli, C. et al. (2021). The 2021 report of the Lancet Countdown on health and climate change: code red for health future. The Lancet, 398(10311),1619 1662. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01787-6
Rosenberg, T. E. (2013). Intermingled Bodies. Distributed Agency in an Expanded Appreciation of Making. FormAkademisk, 6(2) 1-18. https://doi.org/10.7577/formakademisk.658
Rosenblatt, L. (2005). Making meaning with texts: Selected essays. Pearson Education.
SCA (December 5, 2017a). Utbildningsmaterial [Educational materials]. https://www.sverigeskonsumenter.se/vad-vi-gor/utbildningsmaterial/hallbar-textilkonsumtion/utbildningsmaterial/
SCA (December 5, 2017b). Hållbart mode. Konsumentmakt [Sustainable fashion. Consumer power]. https://www.sverigeskonsumenter.se/media/uo3oho35/konsumentmakt_ny.pdf
SCA (December 5, 2017c). Hållbart mode. Normkritik [Sustainable fashion. Critique of norms]. https://www.sverigeskonsumenter.se/media/c0kpx1sc/normkritik_ny.pdf
Sennett, R. (2008). The craftsman. Penguin Books.
Stegall, N. (2006). Designing for Sustainability: A Philosophy for Ecologically Intentional Design. Design Issues, 22(2), 56–63. https://doi.org/10.1162/desi.2006.22.2.56
Stevenson, R. B., Broady, M., Dillon, J., & Wals, A. E. J. (2013). International handbook of research on environmental education. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203813331
Usher, K., Durkin J. & Bhullar N. (2019). Eco-anxiety: How thinking about climate change-related environmental decline is affecting our mental health. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 28, 1233–1234. https://doi.org/10.1111/inm.12673
UNESCO. (1987). Our common future. Oxford University Press.
Van Poeck, K., Vandenplas E. & Östman L. (2023). Teaching action-oriented knowledge on sustainability issues, Environmental Education Research, 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2023.2167939
Wickman, P.-O. (2006). Aesthetic experience in science education: Learning and meaning making as situated talk and action. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Wickman, P.-O., & Östman, L. (2002). Learning as discourse change: A sociocultural mechanism, Science Education, 86, 601–623. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10036
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Hanna Hofverberg, Johnny Franzén, Ninitha Maivorsdotter
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
- The author(s) must manage their economic reproduction rights to any third party.
- The journal makes no financial or other compensation for submissions, unless a separate agreement regarding this matter has been made with the author(s).
- The journal is obliged to archive the manuscript (including metadata) in its originally published digital form for at least a suitable amount of time in which the manuscript can be accessed via a long-term archive for digital material, such as in the Norwegian universities’ institutional archives within the framework of the NORA partnership.
Readers of the journal can print out the published manuscripts under the same conditions as apply to the reproduction of physical copies.