Material-based and artistic exploration of form, movement, and programming in primary school makerspaces

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7577/formakademisk.5933

Keywords:

Maker-centered learning, Makerspace, Creative processes with hybrid materials, Programming, Artistic exploration

Abstract

Makerspaces in Norwegian schools introduce creative practices with both new and traditional materials, tools, and technologies. The perspective of arts and crafts has been less emphasized in these workshops, which are primarily led by science teachers. The research project presented in this article is based on research-practice partnership methods where teachers and researchers collaborate to develop and implement makerspace activities that integrate both scientific and arts and crafts knowledge. The study explores second-grade students' maker-oriented learning and their teachers' practices and development of makerspace activities through the following research question: How can material-based and artistic exploration of form, movement, and programming invite reflective and creative processes in primary school makerspaces, and how can teachers support these processes? The study demonstrates that a material-based and artistic approach in makerspaces enhances students' ability to discover and express themselves in diverse ways. Makerspaces offer opportunities to bridge tradition and new technologies and can be understood as a collective exploratory opportunity space where students gain experience in taking ownership and shaping their world.

Author Biographies

Lovise Søyland, University of South-Eastern Norway

PhD, Associate professor in Design, Art and Crafts
Department of visual and performing arts education
https://www.usn.no/english/about/contact-us/employees/lovise-soyland

Ingrid Holmboe Høibo, University of South-Eastern Norway

Research fellow
Department of visual and performing arts education
https://www.usn.no/english/about/contact-us/employees/ingrid-holmboe-hoibo

Peter Haakonsen , OsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University

Assistant Professor
Department of art, design and drama
https://www.oslomet.no/en/about/employee/peterh/

References

Bale, K. (2009). Estetikk – en innføring. Pax.

Bosch, N., Lavonen, J. & Kanges, K. (2022). Learning to Create: Creating to Learn, In T. Korhonen, K. Kangas & L. Salo (Eds.), Invention Pedagogy – The Finnish Approach to Maker Education (pp. 56-70). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003287360-6

Bringa, E. E. (2023, 21. november). Vi må gripe for å begripe. NRK, Ytring. https://www.nrk.no/ytring/vi-ma-gripe-for-a-begripe-1.16644500

Bøhn, E. D. (2022). Teknologiens filosofi: metafysiske problemstillinger. Cappelen Damm.

Bøhn, E. D. (2024, 24. januar). Kunnskap for felles framtid [Paperpresentasjon]. Profesjonskonferansen i Vestfold. Kunnskapsformer i framtidas skole, Universitetet I Sørøst-Norge, campus Vestfold. https://www.usn.no/profesjonskonferansen/profesjonskonferansen-2024-kunnskapsformer-i-framtidas-skole

Clapp, E. P., Berger, R., & Donner, W. (2017). Maker-centered learning: empowering young people to shape their worlds (First ed.). Jossey-Bass.

Coburn, C. E., & Penuel, W. R. (2016). Research-Practice Partnerships in Education: Outcomes, Dynamics, and Open Questions. Educational Researcher, 45(1), 48–54. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X16631750

Digranes, I., Hoem, J. Ø., & Stenersen, A. L. (2021). Learning about materiality through tinkering with Micro:bits. FormAkademisk, 14(4). https://doi.org/10.7577/formakademisk.4636

Dewey, J. (2005). Art as experience. Berkley Publishing. (Opprinnelig utgitt 1934)

Eisenberg, M. & Pares, N. (2014). Tangible and Full-Body Interfaces in Learning. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 1–18). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139519526.021

Fereday, J., & Muir-Cochrane, E. (2006). Demonstrating rigour using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(1), Article 7. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690600500

FIKS – Forskning, innovasjon og kompetanseutvikling i skolen. (2023). Digitale enheter i grunnopplæringen. Universitetet i Oslo. https://www.uv.uio.no/forskning/satsinger/fiks/kunnskapsbase/digitalisering-i-skolen/Digitale%20enheter%20i%20grunnoppl%C3%A6ringen/

Groth, C. & Gulliksen, M. S. (2024). Thinking through hands in education. In T. Schilhab & C. Groth (Eds.) Embodied Learning and Teaching using the 4E Cognition Approach: Exploring Perspectives in Teaching Practices (pp. 83-93). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003341604-13

Gulliksen, M. S. & Randers-Pehrson, A. (2024, 11. mars). «Pisa-krisa» i Norge har en enkel løsning. Forskersonen. https://www.forskersonen.no/barn-og-ungdom-elever-kronikk/pisa-krisa-i-norge-har-en-enkel-losning/2336435

Gulliksen, M. S. (2017). Making matters? Unpacking the role of practical aesthetic making activities in the general education through the theoretical lens of embodied learning. Cogent Education, 4(1). http://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2017.1415108

Gulliksen, M. S., & Homlong, S. (2013). Editorial. Making, Materiality and Knowledge. FormAkademisk, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.7577/formakademisk.649

Hakkarainen, K. & Seitamaa-Hakkarainen, P. (2022). Learning by Inventing Theoretical Foundations, In T. Korhonen, K. Kangas & L. Salo (Eds), Invention Pedagogy – The Finnish Approach to Maker Education (pp. 15-27). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003287360-3

Hatch, M. (2013). The Maker Movement Manifesto: Rules for Innovation in the New World of Crafters, Hackers, and Tinkerers. McGraw-Hill.

Høibo, I. H. (2023). Læringssyn i skaparrørslelitteraturen. Techne serien – Forskning i slöjdpedagogik och slöjdvetenskap, 30(2), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.7577/TechneA.4946

Høibo, I. H., & Lerpold, M. H. (2020). Digitale ferdigheiter som ferdigrett eller råvare? FormAkademisk, 13(3). https://doi.org/10.7577/formakademisk.3696

Høibo, I. H., Seitamaa-Hakkarainen, P. & Groth, C. (2024). |Teachers’ pedagogical beliefs in Norwegian school makerspaces. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 35, 611–628. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-024-09919-0

Ingold, T. (2013). Making: Anthropology, Archaeology, Art and Architecture. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203559055

Kjosavik, S. (2001). Fra tegning, sløyd og håndarbeid til kunst og håndverk. En faghistorie gjennom 150 år. Tell forlag.

Korhonen, T., Kangas, K. & Salo, L. (2022). Invention Pedagogy – The Finnish Approach to Maker Education. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003287360

Krajcik, J. S. & Shin, N. (2014). Project-Based Learning. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 275–297). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139519526.018

Martinez, S. L. & Stager, G. (2019). Invent to learn: Making, Tinkering, and Engineering in the Classroom (2. Ed.). Constructing Modern Knowledge Press.

Noë, A. (2006). Action in perception. The MIT Press.

Pacini-Ketchabaw, V., Kind, S. & Kocher, L. L. M (2017). Encounters With Materials in Early Childhood Education. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315743257

Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms – Children, computers, and powerful ideas. Basic Books.

Sawyer, R. K. (2021). The iterative and improvisational nature of the creative process. Journal of Creativity, 31(100002), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yjoc.2021.100002

Schad, M., & Jones, W. M. (2020). The Maker Movement and Education: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Journal of research on technology in education, 52(1), 65-78. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2019.1688739

Schilhab, T. & Groth, C. (2024). Embodied Learning and Teaching using the 4E Cognition Approach: Exploring Perspectives in Teaching Practices. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003341604

Seel, M. (2005). The aesthetics of appearing (J. Farrel, Overs.). Stanford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781503619852

Sormunen, K., Kangas, K., Korhonen, T. & Seitamaa-Hakkarainen, P. (2022). Designing and Structuring the Invention Process, In T. Korhonen, K. Kangas & L. Salo [Eds], Invention Pedagogy – The Finnish Approach to Maker Education (pp. 117-130). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003287360-11

Søyland, L. (2021). Grasping materialities: Making sense through explorative touch interactions with materials and digital technology [Doktorgradsavhandling/ Universitetet i Sørøst-Norge]. USN Open Archive. https://hdl.handle.net/11250/2756969

Søyland, L., Høibo, I. H., Groth, C. & Seitamaa-Hakkarainen, P. (2025). Explorative Interaction with Materiality in Norwegian Primary School Makerspaces from the Perspective of Arts and Crafts Education. International Journal of Art & Design Education. https://doi.org/10.1111/jade.12547

Utdanningsdirektoratet (Udir). (2019). Kunnskapsløftet 2020. Læreplan i kunst og håndverk (KHV0102). Fastsatt som forskrift. Læreplanverket for Kunnskapsløftet 2020. https://www.udir.no/lk20/khv01-02

Waterhouse, A. H. L., Søyland, L., & Carlsen, K. (2019). Eksperimentelle utforskinger av materialer og materialitet i transmaterielle landskaper. FormAkademisk, 12(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.7577/formakademisk.2648

Elever som ser på figurer som lager skyggebilder på vegg

Published

2025-07-02

How to Cite

Søyland, L., Holmboe Høibo, I., & Haakonsen , P. (2025). Material-based and artistic exploration of form, movement, and programming in primary school makerspaces. FormAkademisk, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.7577/formakademisk.5933

Cited by