Human rights education—a republican perspective
The concept of freedom is at the moral core of human rights and human rights education. In the liberal tradition, the prevalent understanding of freedom is non-interference. In the republican tradition, however, freedom is primarily conceived of as non-domination rather than non-interference. This article discusses whether the republican ideal of freedom is conducive to the ambition of human rights education to strengthen and develop respect for human rights, and to build and promote a culture of human rights. The article argues that a republican perspective, although challenging, is important, because it identifies central aspects of freedom that are vital to the fundamental standing of persons and to living a life in dignity, and because it emphasises active citizenship and civic virtue as important for realising freedom. It further argues that a republican perspective requires a multidisciplinary approach to human rights education.
Bellamy, R. (2013). Rights, republicanism and democracy. In A. Niederberger & P. Schink (Eds.), Republican democracy: liberty, law and politics (pp. 253–275). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9780748643066.003.0011 https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9780748643066.003.0011
Berlin, I. (1969/1997). Two concepts of liberty. In R. E. Goodin & P. Pettit (Eds.), Contemporary political philosophy. An anthology (pp. 369-386). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
Bielefeldt, H., Ghanea, N. & Wiener, M. (2016). Freedom of religion or belief—An international law commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Carter, I. (2008). How are power and unfreedom related? In C. Laborde & J. Maynor (Eds.), Republicanism and political theory (pp. 58–82). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Cohen, J. (1989). Deliberation and Democratic Legitimacy. In A. Hamlin & P. Pettit (Eds.), The Good Polity: Normative Analysis of the State (pp. 17-34). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Council of Europe (1950). European convention for the protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms, as amended by Protocols Nos. 11 and 14, 4 November 1950, ETS 5. Retrieved from https://www.refworld.org/docid/3ae6b3b04.html
Council of Europe (2010). Charter on education for democratic citizenship and human rights education. Retrieved from https://www.coe.int/en/web/edc/charter-on-education-for-democratic-citizenship-and-human-rights-education
Council of Europe (2013). Charter on education for democratic citizenship and human rights education. Guidelines for educators. Retrieved from https://edoc.coe.int/en/human-rights-democratic-citizenship-and-interculturalism/5705-charter-on-education-for-democratic-citizenship-and-human-rights-education-guidelines-for-educators.html
Constant, B. (1988). The liberty of the ancients compared with that of the moderns. In B. Fontana (Ed.), Political writings (pp. 307-328). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dagger, R. (1997). Civic virtues. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dryzek, J. S. & Braithwaite, V. (2000). On the prospects for democratic deliberation: values analysis applied to Australian Politics. Political Psychology 21(2), 241–266. https://doi.org/10.1111/0162-895X.00186 https://doi.org/10.1111/0162-895X.00186
Dworkin, R. (1984). Liberalism. In M. Sandel (Ed.), Liberalism and its critics (pp. 60–79). New York: New York University Press.
Daly, E. (2019). Republican rights? Proportionality, justification and non-domination. In E. Herlin-Karnell & M. Klatt (Eds.), Constitutionalism justified: Rainer Forst in discourse (pp. 197-218). Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190889050.003.0009 https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190889050.003.0009
Friis Nilsen, H. (2014). Den politiske frihetens glemte historie [The forgotten history of political freedom]. In H. Friis Nilsen & H. Jordheim, (Eds.), Politisk frihet [Political freedom] (pp. 13-52). Oslo: Res Publica.
Habermas, J. (1994). Three normative models of democracy. Constellations, 1(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8675.1994.tb00001.x https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8675.1994.tb00001.x
Hansen, O. H. B. (2013). Promoting classical tolerance in public education—what should we do with the objection condition? Ethics and education, 8(1), 65-76. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449642.2013.798529 https://doi.org/10.1080/17449642.2013.798529
Hansen, O. H. B. (2018). Promoting autonomy in public education—a narrow civic approach. Religion and Education, 45(2), 173-189. https://doi.org/10.1080/15507394.2018.1425076 https://doi.org/10.1080/15507394.2018.1425076
Hansen, O. H. B. (2022). Republikanisme og demokratisk medborgerskap i skolen [Republicanism and democratic citizenship in education]. In H. Friis-Nilsen (Ed.), Myndig medborgerskap. Demokratiforståelse i skolen [Empowered citizenship. Understanding of democracy in education] (pp. 39–60). Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
Honohan, I. (2005). Educating citizens: Nation-building and its republican limits. In I. Honohan & J. Jennings (Eds.), Republicanism in Theory and Practice (pp. 199-213). London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203003343 https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203003343
Honohan, I. (2017). Liberal and republican conceptions of citizenship. In A. Schachtar, R. Baumböck, I. Bloemraad & M. Vink (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of citizenship (pp. 83-106). Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198805854.013.4 https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198805854.013.4
Jackson, R. (2018). Human rights in relation to education about religions and world views: the contribution of the Council of Europe to classroom religious education. Journal of Religious Education, 66(1), 85-97. http://doi.org/10.1007/s40839-018-0062-z https://doi.org/10.1007/s40839-018-0062-z
Kramer, M.H. (2008). Liberty and domination. In C. Laborde & J. Maynor (Eds.), Republicanism and political theory (pp. 31-57). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Kristjànsson, K. (1998). Is there something wrong with ‘free action’? Journal of Theoretical Politics, 10(3), 259–273. https://doi.org/10.1177/0951692898010003001 https://doi.org/10.1177/0951692898010003001
Laborde, C. (2013). Republicanism. In M. Freeden & M. Stears (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political ideologies (pp. 513-535). Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199585977.013.0029 https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199585977.013.0029
Larmore, C. (2001). A critique of Philip Pettit’s republicanism. Philosophical Issues, 11(1), 229–243. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1758-2237.2001.tb00045.x https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1758-2237.2001.tb00045.x
Lile, H. S. (2019). Human Rights Education. In M. Langford, M. Skivenes, M. & K. H. Søvig (Eds.), Children’s rights in Norway: An implementation paradox? (pp. 415–448). Oslo: Universitetsforlaget. https://doi.org/10.18261/9788215031415-2019-15 https://doi.org/10.18261/9788215031415-2019-15
Lovett, F. (2015). The republican critique of liberalism. In S. Wall (Ed.), Cambridge companion to liberalism (pp. 381-400). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139942478.021 https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139942478.021
Lovett, F. & Whitfield, G. (2016). Republicanism, perfectionism, and neutrality. The Journal of Political Philosophy, 24(1), 120-134. http://doi.org/10.1111/jopp.12067 https://doi.org/10.1111/jopp.12067
Morsink, J. (2009). Inherent human rights: Philosophical roots of the universal declaration. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. https://doi.org/10.9783/9780812202854 https://doi.org/10.9783/9780812202854
Maynor, J. (2003). Republicanism in the modern world. Cambridge: Polity.
MacIntyre, A. (1981). After virtue, A study in moral theory. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
Neufeldt, B. (2019). Non-domination and political liberal citizenship. In C. Macleod and C. Tappolet (Eds.), Philosophical perspectives on moral and civic education. Shaping citizens and their schools (pp. 135-155). New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315146928-8 https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315146928-8
Nussbaum, M. (2011). Creating capabilities; The human development approach. Cambridge, Massachusetts & London, England: The Balkan Press of Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674061200 https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674061200
Peterson, A. (2011). Civic republicanism and civic education: The education of citizens. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan. http://doi.org/10.1057/9780230306752 https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230306752
Pettit, P. (1997). Republicanism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pettit, P. (2001). A theory of freedom. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Pocock, J. (1975). The Machiavellian moment. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Rawls, J. (1996). Political liberalism, New York: Columbia University Press.
Rawls, J. (2001). Justice as fairness. Cambridge: Harvard University Press
Sandel, M. (1982). Liberalism and the limits of justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sandel, M. (1996). Democracy’s discontent. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
Skinner, Q. (1991). The republican ideal of political liberty. In G. Bock, Q. Skinner & M. Viroli, Machiavelli and republicanism (pp. 293-309). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511598463.015 https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511598463.015
Skinner, Q. (2009). Vilkårlig makt, Essays om politisk frihet. Oslo: Res Publica.
Snir, I. & Eylon, Y. (2016). Pedagogy of non-domination: Neo-republican political theory and critical education. Policy Futures in Education, 14(6), 759–774. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478210316650603 https://doi.org/10.1177/1478210316650603
Sunstein, C. (2019). On freedom. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.
Taylor, C. (1989). Cross-purposes: The liberal-communitarian debate. In N. Rosenblum (Ed.), Liberalism and the moral life (pp. 159–182). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674864443.c13 https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674864443.c13
Viroli, M. (1999). Republicanism. New York: Hill and Wang.
Waldron, J. (1999). Law and disagreement. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198262138.001.0001 https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198262138.001.0001
UN General Assembly (1948, December 10). Universal declaration of human rights (217 [III] A). Paris. Retrieved from https://www.un.org/en/about-us/universal-declaration-of-human-rights
UN General Assembly (1959, November 20). Declaration of the Rights of the Child. A/RES/1386(XIV). Retrieved from https://www.refworld.org/docid/3ae6b38e3.html
UN General Assembly (1966a, December 16). International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. United Nations, Treaty Series, 999, p. 171. Retrieved from https://www.refworld.org/docid/3ae6b3aa0.html
UN General Assembly (1966b, December 16). International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. United Nations, Treaty Series, 993. Retrieved from https://www.refworld.org/docid/3ae6b36c0.html
UN General Assembly (1993, July 12). Vienna Declaration and Programme of Action. A/CONF.157/23. Retrieved from https://www.refworld.org/docid/3ae6b39ec.html
UN Human Rights Council (2011, April 8). United Nations Declaration on Human Rights Education and Training. Resolution adopted by the Human Rights Council, A/HRC/RES/16/1. Retrieved from https://www.refworld.org/docid/4db95b0a2.html
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2022 Ole Henrik Borchgrevink Hansen
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Human Rights Education Review agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).