Revisiting the past: human rights education and epistemic justice
Epistemic injustice in human rights education (HRE) can be found in a colonial historical trajectory of human rights that rests on accounts of western agency only. Such narratives overshadow the legacy of Indian and Pakistani freedom fighters and Latin American feminists who negotiated human rights against colonial, patriarchal and racist discourses after the Second World War. Without their contribution a United Nations (UN) rights concept risked being limited to a western trajectory of the ‘Rights of Man’ that represents a monistic universalism. The paper revisits the history of the United Nations, unearthing historical counternarratives of what a pluralistic universalism of human rights means by adding knowledge about postcolonial feminist subjects who spoke of a positive conception that could reduce injustice.
Acharya, A. (2018). Constructing global order: Agency and change in world politics. New York: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316756768
Acharya, A., & Buzan, B. (2007). Why is there no non-Western international relations theory? An Introduction. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 7(3), 287–312. https://doi.org/10.1093/irap/lcm012
Acharya, A., & Plesch, D. (2020). The United Nations: Managing and reshaping a changing world order. Global Governance, (26), 221–235. https://doi.org/10.1163/19426720-02602001
Adami, R. (2014). Human rights for more than one voice: Re-thinking political space beyond the local/global divide. Ethics & Global Politics, 7(4), 163–180. https://doi.org/10.3402/egp.v7.24454
Adami, R. (2015a). Counter narratives as political contestation: Universality, particularity and uniqueness. The Equal Rights Review, 15, 13–24.
Adami, R. (2015b). On subalternity and representation: Female and postcolonial subjects claiming universal human rights in 1948. Journal of Research on Women and Gender, 6, 56–66.
Adami, R. (2017). The critical potential of using counter narratives in human rights education. In M. Zembylas & A. Keet (Eds.), Critical human rights, citizenship, and democracy education: Entanglements and regenerations (pp 67-84). London: Bloomsbury.
Adami, R. (2019). Women and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429437939
Adami, R., & Plesch, D. (Eds.) (2022). Women and the UN: A new history of women’s international human rights. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003036708
Andreotti, V. (2011). Actionable postcolonial theory in education. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230337794
Barthélémy, P. (2016). Macoucou à Pékin. L’arèna Internationale: Une ressource politique pour les Africanes dans les années 1940-1950 [Macoucou in Beijing. The International arena: A political resource for African women in the 1940s-1950s]. La Découverte, (255), 17–33. https://doi.org/10.3917/lms.255.0017
Becker, A. (2021). Decolonial human rights education: Changing the terms and content of conversations on human rights. Human Rights Education Review, 4(2), 49–68. https://doi.org/10.7577/hrer.3989
Bekerman, Z., & Zembylas, M. (2013). Teaching contested narratives: Identity, memory and reconciliation in peace education and beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Burke, R. (2010). Decolonization and the evolution of international human rights. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. https://doi.org/10.9783/9780812205329
Burke, R. (2022). Universal human rights for women: UN engagement with traditional abuses, 1948-1965. In R. Adami & D. Plesch (Eds.), Women and the UN: A new history of international human rights (pp. 71–87). London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003036708-5
Casledine, J. (2008). “In a solid bond of unity”: Anticolonial feminism in the Cold War era. Journal of Women’s History, 20(4), 57–81. https://doi.org/10.1353/jowh.0.0053
Chesler, E. (2022). Who wrote CEDAW? In R. Adami & D. Plesch (Eds.), Women and the UN: A new history of women's international human rights (pp.104-124). London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003036708-7
Cooper, F. (1997). The dialectics of decolonization: Nationalism and labor movements in postwar French Africa. In F. Cooper & A. L. Stoler (Eds.), Tensions of empire: Colonial cultures in a bourgeois world (pp. 406–435). USA: University of California Press. https://doi.org/10.1525/california/9780520205406.003.0013
Dietrichson, E., & Sator, F. (2022). The Latin American women: How they shaped the UN Charter and why southern agency is forgotten. In In R. Adami, & D. Plesch (Eds.), Women and the UN: A new history of women’s international human rights (pp 17-38). London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003036708-2
Forbes, G. (1996). The new Cambridge history of India. Women in modern India. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Fricker, M. (2007). Epistemic injustice: Power and the ethics of knowing. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198237907.001.0001
Eriksen, K.G. (2018). The indigenous Sami citizen and Norwegian national identity: Tensions in curriculum discourses. Human Rights Education Review, 1(2), 26–45. https://doi.org/10.7577/hrer.2852
Ikramullah, S. B. (1998). From Purdah to Parliament. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Katz, S. R., & McEnvoy Spero, A. (Eds.) (2015). Bringing human rights education to US classrooms: Exemplary models from elementary grades to university. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Keet, A. (2012). Discourse, betrayal, critique: The renewal of human rights education. In C. Roux (Ed.), (2012). Safe spaces: Human rights education in diverse contexts (pp. 7–28). London: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-936-7_2
Liang, W. (2017). China’s search for human rights education in secondary schools. Prospects, 47, 41–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-018-9423-3
Liang, W. (2020). Teachers’ responses to human rights education policies and practices in a Chinese secondary school. Journal of Moral Education, 49(4), 529–544. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240.2019.1667756
Iordanou, K., Kendeou, P., & Zembylas, M. (2020). Examining my-side bias during and after reading controversial historical accounts. Metacognition and Learning, 15, 319–342. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-020-09240-w
Lupin Townsend, D., & Townsend, L. (2021). Epistemic injustice and indigenous peoples in the Inter-American human rights system. Social Epistemology, 35(2), 147–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2020.1839809
Marks, S. (1997). Human rights education in UN peace building: From theory to practice. In G. Andreopoulos, & R. Claude (Eds.), Human rights education for the twenty-first century (pp.35-50). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press
Marino, K. (2019). Feminism for the Americas: The making of an international human rights movement. Chapel Hill, NC: The University of North Carolina Press. https://doi.org/10.5149/northcarolina/9781469649696.001.0001
Marino, K. (2022). From women’s rights to human rights: The influence of Pan-American feminism on the United Nations. In R. Adami, & D. Plesch (Eds.), Women and the UN: A new history of women’s international human rights (pp 1-16). London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003036708-1
Mehta, H. (1981). Indian woman. Delhi: Butala
Moyn, S. (2012). The last utopia: Human rights in history. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjk2vkf
O’Donoghue, A., & Rowe, A. (2022). Feminism, global inequality, and the 1975 Mexico City conference. In R. Adami & D. Plesch (Eds.), Women and the UN: A new history of international human rights (pp. 88–103). London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003036708-6
Osler, A. (2015). Human rights education, postcolonial scholarship, and action for social justice. Theory & Research in Social Education, 43(2), 244–274. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2015.1034393
Parker, W. C. (2018). Human rights education’s curriculum Problem. Human Rights Education Review, 1(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.7577/hrer.2450
Rapoport, A. (2021). Human rights and global citizenship in social studies standards in the United States. Human Rights Education Review, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.7577/hrer.3997
Reilly, J. E. (2018). Reporting without knowledge: The absence of human rights in US journalism education. Human Rights Review, 19, 249–271. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12142-018-0493-7
Robinson, C., Phillips, L., & Quennerstedt, A. (2020). Human rights education: Developing a theoretical understanding of teachers’ responsibilities. Educational Review, 72(2), 220–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2018.1495182
Roux, C. (Ed.) (2012). Safe spaces: Human rights education in diverse contexts. London: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-936-7
Sen, A. (2020). “Powerful” human rights education’s curriculum problems. Cambridge Journal of Education, 50 (4). https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2020.1718609
Sikkink, K. (2017). Evidence for hope: Making human rights work in the 21st century. Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvc77hg2
Singh Rathore, K. (2022). Excavating hidden histories: Indian women in the early history of the United Nations. In In R. Adami, & D. Plesch (Eds.), Women and the UN: A new history of women’s international human rights (pp 39-54). London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003036708-3
Swedish National Agency for Education. (2018). Curriculum for the compulsory school, preschool class and school-age educare (revised 2018) (pp. 1–304). Stockholm. Retrieved 10 Sep 2021 from https://www.skolverket.se/publikationer?id=3984
Stoler, A. L., & Cooper, F. (1997). Between metropole and colony: Rethinking a research agenda. In F. Cooper & A. L. Stoler (Eds.), Tensions of empire: Colonial cultures in a bourgeois world (pp. 1–56). USA: University of California Press. https://doi.org/10.1525/california/9780520205406.003.0001
Struthers, A., & Mansuy, J. (2020). “British values are also values all around the world”: Teaching fundamental British values through a human rights lens. Journal of Human Rights Practice, 12, 696–710. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhuman/huaa042
Todd, S. (2010). Toward an imperfect education: Facing humanity, rethinking cosmopolitanism. Boulder: Paradigm
Tuhiwai Smith, L. (2012). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples. London: Zed Books.
United Nations Commission on Human Rights. (1948). Comments from governments on the draft international declaration on human rights (No. E/CN.4/82/Add.12). Retrieved from https://undocs.org/E/CN.4/82/ADD.12
United Nations General Assembly. (1948). Verbatim record 182nd plenary meeting (No. A/PV.182). Retrieved from United Nations Library & Archives, New York.
United Nations Third Committee. (1948). Summary record 125th meeting (No. A/C.3/SR.125). Retrieved from United Nations Library & Archives, New York.
Waterman, P. (1993). Hidden from herstory: Women, feminism and new global solidarity. Economic and Political Weekly, 28(44), WS83–WS100.
Werkheiser, I. (2020). A rights to understand injustice: Epistemology and the “right to the truth” in international human rights discourse. The Southern Journal of Philosophy, 58(1), 186–199. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjp.12354
Woldeyes, Y. G., & Offord, B. (2018). Decolonizing human rights education: Critical pedagogy praxis in higher education. The International Education Journal: Comparative Perspectives, 17(1), 24–36.
Yang, W.K. (2015). Afterword: Will human rights education be decolonizing? In S. Katz, & A. McEnvoy Spero (Eds.), Bringing human rights education to US classrooms: Exemplary models from elementary grades to university (pp.225-236). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Zembylas, M., Charalambous, P., Charalambous, C., & Lesta, S. (2017). Toward a critical hermeneutical approach of human rights education: Universal ideals, contextual realities and teachers’ difficulties. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 49(4), 497–517. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2016.1188156
Zembylas, M., & Keet, A. (Eds.) (2018). Critical human rights, citizenship, and democracy education: Entanglements and regenerations. London: Bloomsbury
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2021 Rebecca ADAMI
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Human Rights Education Review agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).