Keywords:social innovation, higher education, health services, welfare sector, scoping review
Introduction: Nordic countries face societal challenges for which social innovation may represent solutions. The aim of this scoping review is to explore the concept of social innovation within the research contexts of higher education, ealthcare, and welfare services.
Method: A scoping review methodology was used, including a literature search and the identification of eligible studies published between 2007 and 2019, in addition to data extraction and synthesis. Forty-three studies were included in this review.
Results: Across the research contexts, social innovation is conceptualized as a set of novel, creative, human-centred, and value-driven processes aiming to bring about change. Qualitative research methods dominate social innovation research. In welfare services, social innovation concerns the relationship between policy and praxis, new forms of leadership and management, and the promotion of societal inclusion and cohesion. Social innovation in healthcare comprises the use of technology to digitalize service, enhance patients’ well-being, and improve service quality. In higher education, social innovation research focuses on educational reforms involving non-profit stakeholders.
Discussion: Social innovation is a multifaceted concept related to change at the organizational or societal level, often with various stakeholders working together to create improvements. The lack of a common definition and framework of social innovation makes this concept difficult to measure or quantify, reflecting the dominance of qualitative research methods in the selected research contexts. Across these research contexts, social innovation can be defined and used for various research purposes, which are often political and value-based, with the latter connected to the common good and people’s well-being. Moreover, few social innovation studies have been performed in Nordic countries.
Alden Rivers, B., Armellini, A., Maxwell, R., Allen, S., & Durkin, C. (2015). Social innovation education: Towards a framework for learning design. Higher Education, Skills and Work-Based Learning Article, 5(4), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1108/HESWBL-04-2015-0026
Andersen, J., & Bilfeldt, A. (2017). Social innovation in public institutions in Denmark: The role of action research. In 9th Action Learning Action Research and 13th Participatory Action Research World Congress (pp. 15-37). Sydney University Press. https://doi.org/10.3224/ijar.v13i3.02
Arksey, H., & O'Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19-32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616
Avelino, F., Wittmayer, J.M., Pel, B., Weaver, P., Dumitru, A., Haxeltine, A., Kemp, R., Jørgensen, M.S., Bauler, T., Ruijsink, S. & O'Riordan, T. (2019). Transformative social innovation and (dis)empowerment. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 145, 195-206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.05.002
Ballard, M., Tran, J., Hersch, F., Lockwood, A., Hartigan, P. & Montgomery, P. (2017). Supporting better evidence in generation and use within social innovation in health in low- and middle-income countries: A qualitative study. PloS One, 12(1), e0170367. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0170367
Bjerregaard, L. B. S., Maciulskyte, S., Acienė, E., & Christensen, J. (2018). Towards A model of social innovation: Cross-border learning processes. Social Welfare: Interdisciplinary Approach, 1(8), 8-23. https://doi.org/10.21277/sw.v1i8.377
Borzaga, C., & Bodini, R. (2014). What to make of social innovation? Towards a framework for policy development. Social Policy and Society, 13(3), 411-421. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474746414000116
Bureau of European Policy Advisers (BEPA) (2011). Empowering people, driving change: Social innovation in the European Union. file:///C:/Users/2900933/Downloads/NJ7911114ENC_002.pdf
Casanova, G., Tur-Sinai, A., & Lamura, G. (2019). Innovating long-term care provision in Mediterranean welfare states: A comparison between Italy and Israel. Journal of Aging & Social Policy, 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1080/08959420.2019.1589888
Caulier-Grice, J., Davies, A., Patrick, R., & Norman, W. (2012). Defining social innovation. A deliverable of the project: The theoretical, empirical and policy foundations for building social innovation in Europe (TEPSIE). Brussels: European Commission, DG Research. http://siresearch.eu/sites/default/files/1.1%20Part%201%200defining%20social%20innovation_0/pdf
Cavalcante, M. T. L., Riberas, G., & Rosa, G. (2016). Fostering innovation in social work and social education degrees: Multilingual environment and tools for social change. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 13(1), 31. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-016-0031-0
Cheema, A. R., & Mehmood, A. (2019). Reproductive health services: 'Business-in-a-Box' as a model social innovation. Development in Practice, 29(2), 196-207.https://doi.org/10.1080/09614524.2018.1541166
Commission of the European Communities (2008). Renewed social agenda: Opportunities, access and solidarity in 21st century Europe. Brussels. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2008:0412:FIN:EN:PDF
Cools, P. & Oosterlynck, S. (2019). Social service innovation and welfare recalibration: A case study of a local training to work trajectory in Belgium. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research. http//doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2019.1594715
Crepaldi, C., De Rosa, E., & Pesce, F. (2012). Literature review on innovation in social services in Europe: Sectors of health, education and welfare services. INNOSERV Work Package, 1.
Dai, H., Lau, Y. & Lee, K.H. (2019). Social innovation, value penetration, and the power of the nonprofit sector: Workers' co-operative societies in Hong Kong. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 1-19. 10.1177/0899764019863107
De Freitas, C., Dos Reis, V., Silva, S., Videira, P. A., Morava, E., & Jaeken, J. (2017). Public and patient involvement in needs assessment and social innovation: A people-centred approach to care and research for congenital disorders of glycosylation. BMC Health Services Research, 17(1), 682. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2625-1
De Rosa, E. (2017). Social innovation and ICT in social services: European experiences compared. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 30(4), 421-432. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2017.1348936
Farmer, J., Carlisle, K., Dickson-Swift, V., Teasdale, S., Kenny, A., Taylor, J., . . . & Gussy, M. (2018). Applying social innovation theory to examine how community co-designed health services develop: Using a case study approach and mixed methods. BMC Health Services Research, 18(1), 68. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-2852-0
Fritzell, J., Bäckman, O., & Ritakallio, V. M. (2012). Income inequality and poverty: Do the Nordic countries still constitute a family of their own? Changing Social Equality: The Nordic Welfare Model in the 21st Century. LIS Working Paper Series, No. 563 https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/95444/1/68220689X.pdf
Fuller, A., & Unwin, L. (2004). Expansive learning environments: Integrating organizational and personal development. In H. Rainbird, A. Fuller, & A. Munro (Eds.), Workplace learning in context (pp. 126-144). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203571644
Fuller, A., Halford, S., Lyle, K., Taylor, R., & Teglborg, A.-C. (2018). Innovating for a cause: The work and learning required to create a new approach to healthcare for homeless people. Journal of Education and Work, 31(3), 219-233. https://doi.org/10.13639080.2018.1447654
Gawell, M. (2014). Social entrepreneurship and the negotiation of emerging social enterprise markets: Re-considerations in Swedish policy and practice. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 27(3), 251-266. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-11-2012-0143
Giraud, O., Lucas, B., Falk, K., Kümpers, S., & Lechevalier, A. (2014). Innovations in local domiciliary long-term care: From libertarian criticism to normalisation. Social Policy and Society, 13(3), 433-444. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474746414000153
Gravili, G. (2013). Healthcare social media for a social innovation: The key to improve a collaborative model of organizing, transforming doctor-patient communication. Proceedings of IFKAD-ISSN, 2280, 787X.
Grindell, C., Mawson, S., Gerrish, K., Parker, S., & Bissell, P. (2019). Exploring the acceptability and usability of a novel social innovation to encourage physical activity: The iStep prototype. Health & Social Care in the Community, 27(2), 383-391. https://doi.org/10.1111/hsc.12656
Grohs, S., Schneiders, K., & Heinze, R. G. (2015). Social entrepreneurship versus intrapreneurship in the German social welfare state: A study of old-age care and youth welfare services. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 44(1), 163-180. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764013501234
Grohs, S., Schneiders, K. & Heinze, R.G. (2017). Outsiders and intrapreneurs: The institutional embeddedness of social entrepreneurship in Germany. International Society for Third-Sector Research, 28, 2569-2591. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-016-9777-1
Hartley, J. (2005). Innovation in governance and public services: Past and present. Public Money and Management, 25(1), 27-34.
Howaldt, J., & Kopp, R. (2012). Shaping social innovation by social research. In Challenge Social Innovation (pp. 43-55). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32879-4_3
Huq, J. L. (2019). Conditioning a professional exchange field for social innovation. Business & Society, 58(5), 1047-1082. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650318758321
Jiang, M., & Thagard, P. (2014). Creative cognition in social innovation. Creativity Research Journal, 26(4), 375-388. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2014.961774
Johansson, S. & Stefansen, K. (2019). Policy-making for the diffusion of social innovations: The case of the Barnahus model in the Nordic region and the broader European context, Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2019.1598255
Jungsberg, L., Copus, A., Herslund, L. B., Nilsson, K., Perjo, L., Randall, L., & Berlina, A. (2020). Key actors in community-driven social innovation in rural areas in the Nordic countries. Journal of Rural Studies, 79, 276-285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.08.004
Kickul, J., Terjesen, S., Bacq, S., & Griffiths, M. (2012). Social business education: An interview with Nobel Laureate Muhammad Yunus. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 11(3), 453-462. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2011.0500
Kim, J., Trahan, M., Bellamy, J., & Hall, J. A. (2019). Advancing the innovation of family meeting models: The role of teamwork and parent engagement in improving permanency. Children and Youth Services Review, 100, 147-155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2019.02.039
Kitamura, Y., Yamamoto, H., & Yamaguchi, K. (2016). Promoting sustainable regional health care in Japan: Developing a public online map of health care resources and information. Home Health Care Management & Practice, 28(4), 195-200. https://doi.org/10.1177/1084822316629614
Krlev, G., Einarsson, T., Wijkström, F., Heyer, L., & Mildenberger, G. (2020). The policies of social innovation: A cross-national analysis. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 49(3), 457-478. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764019866505
Lindsay, C., Pearson, S., Batty, E., Cullen, A. M., & Eadson, W. (2018). Street-level practice and the co-production of third sector-led employability services. Policy & Politics, 46(4), 571-587. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557317X15120417452025
Merickova, B. M., Nemec, J., & Svidronova, M. (2015). Co-creation in local public services delivery innovation: Slovak experience. Lex Localis, 13(3), 521. https://doi.org/10.4335/13.3.521-535(2015)
Mulgan, G. (2015). Foreword: The study of social innovation-Theory, practice and progress. In: Nicholls, A., Simon, J. & Gabriel, M. (Eds.). New frontiers in social innovation research (pp. x-xxi) Palgrave.
Mulgan, G., Joseph, K. & Norman, W. (2013). Indicators for social innovation. In Gault, F. (Ed.). Handbook of innovation indicators and measurement (pp. 420-437). Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9780857933652.00030
Murray, R., Caulier-Grice, J., & Mulgan, G. (2010). The Open Book of Social Innovation (p. 2). National Endowment for Science, Technology and the Arts.
Nandan, M., London, M., & Bent-Goodley, T. (2015). Social workers as social change agents: Social innovation, social intrapreneurship, and social entrepreneurship. Human Service Organizations Management, Leadership & Governance, 39(1), 38-56. https://doi.org/10.1080/23303131.2014.955236
Nicholls, A., Simon, J. & Gabriel, M. (2015). Introduction: Dimensions of social innovation. In Nicholls, A., Simon, J. & Gabriel, M. (Eds.). New frontiers in social innovation research (pp. 1-26). Palgrave. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137506801_1
Norman, C.D., & Yip, A.L. (2012). EHealth promotion and social innovation with youth: Using social and visual media to engage diverse communities. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 172, 54-70.
Norwegian Institute of Public Health (2019). Indicators for health inequality in the Nordic countries. [Indikatorer på sosial ulikhet i de nordiske landene] Report. Oslo: Norwegian Institute of Public Health. Retrieved March 20 2021, from http://norden.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1316114/FULLTEXT01.pdf
Okada, M., Igarashi, Y., Nomura, T. & Tokuda, T. (2013). The Dementia Project: Innovation driven by social challenges. Fujitsu Scientific Technology Journal, 49(4), 448-454.
Pedersen, A. W., & Kuhnle, S. (2017). The Nordic welfare state model. In Knutsen, Oddbjørn P. (Ed.) The Nordic models in political science: Challenged, but still viable? (pp. 249-272). Bergen: Fagbokforlaget.
Phillips, W., Alexander, E. A., & Lee, H. (2019). Going it alone won't work! The relational imperative for social innovation in social enterprises. Journal of Business Ethics, 156(2), 315-331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3608-1
Pitt-Catsouphes, M., & Berzin, S. (2015). Teaching note-Incorporating social innovation content into macro social work education. Journal of Social Work Education, 51(2), 407-416. https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.2015.1012947
Rantamaki, N. & Kattilakoski, M. (2019) On the trail of local welfare innovations in rural Finland. Regional Science Policy and Practice, 11, 329-343. https://doi.org/10.1111/rsp3.12213
Rittel, H. W. J., & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4(2), 155-169. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01405730
Sabato, S., Vanhercke, B., & Verschraegen, G. (2017). Connecting entrepreneurship with policy experimentation? The EU framework for social innovation. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 30(2), 147-167. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2017.1282308
Sabato, S., Verschraegen, G. (2019). The multi-level governance of social innovation: How the EU supports socially innovative initiatives. Rivista Italiana di Politiche Pubbliche, 14(1), 35-66.
Shier, M. L., & Handy, F. (2016). Executive leadership and social innovation in direct-service nonprofits: Shaping the organizational culture to create social change. Journal of Progressive Human Services, 27(2), 111-130. https://doi.org/10.1080/10428232.2016.1155429
Shier, M. L., & Turpin, A. (2019). An evaluative approach to identify social innovations within human service organizations: Case examples of a pre-formative stage of developmental evaluation. Human Service Organizations: Management, Leadership & Governance, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/23303131.2019.1612806
Székely, I., & Noord, P. V. (2009). Economic crisis in Europe causes, consequences and responses. Brussels European Commission Directorate General for Economic and Financial Affairs. Retrieved December 17, 2020 from https://hdl.handle.net/11245.1/ed564edd-c5d7-4b9f-b117-086c532e17e5.
Stavreva-Kostadinova, P. (2018). Training of social management specialists for participation in social innovation teams. TEM Journal, 7(2), 348-354.
Svensson, P., & Bengtsson, L. (2010). Users' influence in social-service innovations: Two Swedish case studies. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 1(2), 190-212. https://doi.org/10.1080/19420676.2010.511813
Tafel-Viia, K., Loogma, K., Lassur, S., & Roosipõld, A. (2012). Networks as agents of innovation: Teacher networking in the context of vocational and professional higher education reforms. Vocations and Learning, 5(2), 175-193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12186-012-9077-x
Tanggaard, L., & Author (2016). Why novelty is overrated. Journal of Education and Work, 29(6), 728-745. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080.2015.1040379 (Details omitted for double-blind reviewing). https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080.2015.1040379
Tidd, J. & Bessant, J. (2014). Strategic innovation management. Chichester: Wiley.
Traube, D. E., Begun, S., Okpych, N., & Choy-Brown, M. (2017). Catalyzing innovation in social work practice. Research on Social Work Practice, 27(2), 134-138. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731516659140
Vechakul, J., Shrimali, B. P., & Sandhu, J. S. (2015). Human-centered design as an approach for place-based innovation in public health: A case study from Oakland, California. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 19(12), 2552-2559. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-015-1787-x
Visentin, M. (2018). Welfare sharing: An emerging paradigm? An explorative study based on two cases. Sociologia del Lavoro, (152), 139-154. https://doi.org/10.3280/SL2018-152008
Wegener, C. (2016). Driving forces of welfare innovation: explaining interrelations between innovation and professional development. In Billett, S., Dymock, D., & Choy, S. Supporting learning across working life. Dordrecht: Springer. (pp. 113-127).
Weinzierl, C., Wukovitsch, F., & Novy, A. (2016). Housing First in Vienna: A socially innovative initiative to foster social cohesion. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 31(3), 409-422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-015-9467-0
Whittemore, R., Chao, A., Jang, M., Minges, K. E., & Park, C. (2014). Methods for knowledge synthesis: An overview. Heart & Lung, 43(5), 453-461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrtlng.2014.05.014
Willumsen, E. (2020). Samskaping. Sosial innovasjon for helse og velferd. Universitetsforlaget (NOK). (pp. 278–291)
Windrum, P., Schartinger, D. & Warig, J. (2017). Co-creation of social innovations and new professional institutions: Diffusion of therapeutic patient education (TPE) for diabetes in Austria. Industry and Innovation. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2017.1295363
Xiao, D., Gong, M., & Li, X. (2015). Defining design opportunities of healthcare in the perspective of digital social innovation. International Conference on Cross-Cultural Design, 384-393. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20934-0_36
Xie, X., Huang, C.-C., Chen, Y. & Hao, F. (2019). Intelligent robots and rural children. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2019.03.004
Children and Youth Services Review, 100, 283-290.
Aakjær, M. K. (2014). Reconfiguring boundaries in social innovation: co-creating new meaning and practice in a prison context. PhD-Thesis, Professionshøjskolernes Videndatabase, Denmark. Retrieved April 6 2021 from: https://www.ucviden.dk/da/publications/reconfiguring-boundaries-in-social-innovation-co-creating-new-mea
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2021 Anne Marie Lunde Husebø, Marianne Storm, Atle Ødegård, Charlotte Wegener, Marie Aakjær, Anne Lyngby Pedersen, Maja Boelsmand Østergaard, Elisabeth Willumsen
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).