Keywords:Greenlanders, Social work, Welfare policy, Categorization, Postcolonialism, Social Marginalization, Stereotypes
This paper examines the emergence of ‘socially marginalized Greenlanders’ as a distinct target category in Danish welfare policy and practice. It builds on analysis of policies targeting Greenlandic minorities in Denmark and interviews with welfare professionals in charge of implementing these. The paper shows how Greenlandic minorities are represented as characterized by markers of difference viewed to set them apart from other socially marginalized citizens. These relate to 1) structural differences that impact on the ability to receive and benefit from welfare services, 2) to the perceived cultural origins of the problems that socially marginalised Greenlanders face, and, finally, 3) to the excessive social problems associated in policies and by professionals with an upbringing in Greenland. The paper shows how policies and welfare professionals both reject and continuously resort to the notion of the target group as distinct from other socially marginalized citizens. In continuation of this, the analysis further shows how ambivalences and contradictions are not so much found between the levels of policy and practice, as other studies of policy implementation processes have demonstrated, as they are inherent within all policy and considerations about how to understand the target group they articulate.
Bacchi, C. (2009). Analysing policy: What's the problem represented to be? Pearson Australia.
Bacchi, C., & Goodwin, S. (2016). Poststructural policy analysis. A guide to practice. Palgrave. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-52546-8
Baviskar, S. (2015). Grønlændere i Danmark - En registerbaseret kortlægning [Greenlanders in Denmark - a register based mapping]. SFI - Det Nationale Forskningscenter for Velfærd.
Baviskar, S. (2016). Stofmisbrugsbehandling blandt grønlændere i Danmark. SFI - Det Nationale Forskningscenter for Velfærd.
Bjerge, B., Christensen, L., & Oute, J. (2020). Complex cases - Complex representations of problems. International Journal of Drug Policy, 102563, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2019.09.011
Bjerge, B., Oute, J., Christensen, L., & Nygaard-Christensen, M. (2019). Om at "strikke" et socialt tilbud sammen til borgere med komplekse problemstillinger. In B. Bjerge & E. Houborg (Eds.). Rusmiddelbrugere i krydsfeltet mellem sektorer og fagligheder (pp. 19-44). Aarhus University Press. deLeon, P., & deLeon, D. (2002). What ever happened to policy implementation? An alternative approach. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 17, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a003544
Dovidio, J. F., Hewstone, M., Glick, P., & Esses, V. M. (2010). The SAGE handbook of prejudice, stereotyping and discrimination ,Sage Publications.
Fairclough, N. (2006). Discourse and social change. Polity Press.
Flora, J. (2017). Different from all the "others": Mobility and independence among Greenlandic students in Denmark. Arctic Anthropology, 54, 71-82. https://doi.org/10.3368/aa.54.2.71
Harrits, G. S., & Møller, M. Ø. (2011). Categories and categorization: Towards a comprehensive sociological framework. Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory, 12(2), 229-247. https://doi.org/10.1080/1600910X.2011.579450
Hsieh, H.F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277-1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687
Johansen, K. S. (2011). Psychiatric patients with a non-Danish ethnic background: Categorization in a Danish welfare institution. In K. F. Olwig & K. Paerregaard (Eds.), The question of integration: Immigration, exclusion and the Danish welfare state (pp. 168-186). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Keskinen, S. (2017). Securitized intimacies, welfare state and the "other" family. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 24, 154-177. https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxx002
Kettle, D. (1993). Sharing power. Public government in private markets. Brookings.
Lipsky, M. (2010). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public service. Russell Sage Foundation.
Meldgaard, K. (2011). Kofoeds School: The history: 1928-2005. Kofoeds Skole.
Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. The American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340-363. https://doi.org/10.1086/226550
Moore, S. F. (1978). Law as process: An anthropological approach. Oxford University Press.
Mosse, D. (2005). The aid effect: Giving and governing in international development. Pluto Press.
Nielsen, B. (2012). Agens i socialt arbejde: Møder mellem socialarbejdere og klienter med & uden etnisk minoritetsbaggrund i ambulant stofmisbrugsbehandling. Center for Rusmiddelforskning, Aarhus Universitet.
Nygaard-Christensen, M., & Bjerge, B. (2019). Udsatte grønlændere i det danske velfærdssystem: Målrettede indsatser som mulighed og benspænd. STOF: Viden om Rusmidler og Samfund, 33, 8-11.
Rambøll (2008). Evaluation of the follow-up to the white paper on socially marginalized Greenlanders in Denmark [Evaluering af opfølgningen på Hvidbogen om socialt udsatte grønlændere i Danmark]. Rambøll.
Rud, S. (2009). A correct admixture: The ambiguous project of civilising in nineteenth-century Greenland. Itinerario, 33, 29-44. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0165115300003089
Santiago-Irizarry, V. (1996). Culture as cure. Cultural Anthropology, 11(1), 3-24. https://doi.org/10.1525/can.1996.11.1.02a00010
Schneider, A. & Ingram, H. (1993). Social construction of target populations: Implications for politics and policy. American Political Science Review, 87, 334-347. https://doi.org/10.2307/2939044
Scott, J. C. (1998). Seeing like a state: How certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. Yale University Press.
Shore, C., & Wright, S. (1997). Anthropology of policy. Critical perspectives on governance and power. EASA Series. Routledge.
Socialstyrelsen (2013). The Greenlander Strategy 2013-2016 [Grønlænderstrategien 2013-106]. Socialstyrelsen.
Socialstyrelsen (2003). White Paper on Socially Marginalized Greenlanders [Hvidbog om socialt udsatte grønlændere i Danmark). Socialstyrelsen.
Tate, W. (2020). Anthropology of policy: Tensions, temporalities, possibilities. Annual Review of Anthropology, 49, 83-99. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-010220-074250
Togeby, L. (2003). Grønlændere i Danmark - en overset minoritet. Aarhus Universitetsforlag.
Wright, S., & Reinhold, S. (2011). 'Studying through': A strategy for studying political transformation. Or sex, lies and British politics. In C. Shore, S. Wright, & D. Però (Eds.), Policy worlds: Anthropology and the analysis of contemporary power (pp. 86-104). Berghan Books.
Yarrow, T. (2008). Paired opposites: Dualism in development and anthropology. Critique of Anthropology, 28, 426-445. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308275X08098260
- 2021-05-27 (2)
- 2021-05-19 (1)
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2021 Maj Nygaard-Christensen, Bagga Bjerge
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).